The Magic Touch: Contract Controversy in Chinese Soccer

Three sides of this story (Guangzhou Evergrande club, Liu Jian and Qingdao Jonoon club)

During the past several months, a soccer player’s transfer case has been in the spotlight of Chinese soccer circles. This case involves three contracts, which unveil some loopholes of the Chinese soccer league.

The story began on January 3rd, 2014. On the morning of that day, Guangzhou Evergrande soccer club announced on its website that Liu Jian from Qingdao Jonoon soccer club had signed with Guangzhou Evergrande.

However, that night, Qingdao Jonoon stated that Liu Jian’s contract with the club wouldn’t end until 2017, thus, the club did not approve his transfer to Guangzhou Evergrande. As a result, the duration of the contract became an important issue.

All of a sudden, three contracts between Qingdao Jonoon and Liu Jian surfaced, and Liu Jian released details of two of them on his Weibo (the most popular social network similar to Twitter in China).



Guangzhou Evergrande announced the success of Liu Jian’s transfer

The first contract ended on Dec 31st, 2013. The second one expired on Jan 1st, 2014, which meant that Liu Jian would become a free player on that date if no clubs immediately signed him, which made it legal for him to join Guangzhou Evergrande.

Nevertheless, the third contract posted by Qingdao Jonoon shows that Liu Jian will still belong to Qingdao Jonoon until 2017. Therefore, Liu Jian couldn’t be transferred to another other club without permission from Qingdao Jonoon. Another astonishing aspect of the three contracts is that, the annual salaries increase so rapidly, with 800,000 RMB, 2,600,000 RMB and 3,500,000 RMB, respectively.

There is no doubt that one employee just has one official contract with his or her company during a period, so why did Liu Jian sign so many contracts with his club? While this case might seem unbelievable to people who are not familiar with Chinese soccer, this is in fact a common phenomenon in China.

According to a Chinese soccer commentator, there have been 46 similar cases of these multiple contract situations such as Liu Jian’s. Ten years ago, it was found that the salary of the so-called official contract of Shen Si, a former Chinese national soccer team member, was 2,000,000 lower than what his club actually offered. In 2009, several players of Tianjin soccer club collectively terminated training and left the club because of fabricated contracts.

In fact, in order to avoid paying a tax, many soccer clubs around the world sign more than one contract with players. However, Chinese clubs have a different reason for signing two or more contracts with players. The reasoning has to do with several policies that have been enacted by the Chinese soccer association that limits players’ salary and transfer fee. The latest policy even set an upper bound of one million RMB on a player’s annual wage.

All of these policies serve as responses to the strong public outcry that occured approximately a decade ago. Many people argued that soccer players were overpaid, claiming that the overall Chinese soccer players’ level and ability were not worthy of the salaries that they obtained. This group of people pressured the soccer association to limit the salaries of soccer players. As it turned out, the policies that resulted from this debacle went against market rules. The association not only failed to solve the problems, but also triggered a sequence of more complex issues.

Liu Jian’s transfer case is currently processing; we still do not know which one of these contracts is real. Meanwhile, Guangzhou Evergrande has already removed him from its squad list for next season. A panel composed of officials from the Chinese soccer association is still investigating this issue, as people are waiting for a reasonable judgment. If the panel fails to come up with a fair judgment, Liu Jian may not sign with either of these two clubs, and his career may become gloomy.

Although each country has a breadth of unique problems in its sports management system, all sports managers need to bear in mind that all sports policies should be in accordance with disciplines of the market, and perhaps more importantly, should adhere to the principles of the policies to protect players’ benefits.