Event Recap: Union Days '14

This post was written by Taylor Kosakoff, Director of Career Services for the Cornell Sports Business Society.

On Thursday, April 10th, I spoke on behalf of the Cornell ILR Sports Business Society for the annual event, “Union Days”, in the School of Industrial and Labor Relations. “Union Days” is an event sponsored by the Worker Institute at Cornell, which addresses current labor movement issues in various industries. The event I spoke at was titled, “Fighting for Equality in Education, Sports, and the Fashion Industry.”

I was called upon to address the background of the Northwestern football players’ attempt to unionize and the ramifications of this historic event. The reason I was chosen to speak on the panel was because of the research I conducted on this topic for an article that I wrote for the Cornell ILR Sports Business Society’s magazine, Sports Inc., earlier this semester. Although there were many prominent figures in the labor movement on the panel, the speakers that participated in the Northwestern discussion were two players on Cornell’s football team, senior quarterback Jeff Mathews and senior outside linebacker Taylor Engstrom.

The Northwestern football players’ attempt to unionize is a significant development in the labor movement, and could have a meaningful impact on the future of the NCAA and its relationship with student athletes. Previously, students have not had success in their attempts to be treated as employees of their universities. This recent effort to organize demonstrates however, that a change may be on the horizon for student athletes. Led by Northwestern quarterback Kain Colter, the students achieved a significant breakthrough by receiving a decision from a Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board which gave the Northwestern football players employee status. 

Colter and his teammates are trying to gain representation for the student-athletes by the College Athletes Players Association (CAPA), in order to secure benefits that they believe college football players deserve. Specifically, Colter and the CAPA are seeking medical cost coverage for players who sustain injuries during games or practices. Other benefits that they are attempting to secure include ease on transfer restrictions and security of scholarships after injury. Compensation is not a topic of discussion currently and is not the main focus of this movement, but could be a goal in the future. Colter and the CAPA believe that the players deserve more than what they are getting, especially when compared to the millions of dollars the NCAA and universities are making off the efforts by these student-athletes.

The discussion of the Northwestern football players was the final segment of the event. I discussed how the attempt by Northwestern’s football team to unionize could revolutionize the NCAA. This initial step, with the leadership of Colter, may be the impetus for other teams to join this initiative to gain more rights for themselves on the football field. This attempt may even expand to other college sports and include women’s teams. If the student athletes are ultimately deemed employees, there could be a difference in what rights these players may have due to their enrollment in public and private universities, with different laws regarding public and private employees. While there is support for the players’ initiative, many people oppose the idea of unionization and believe that it may ruin the entertainment of the NCAA and college sports.

To see how college football players themselves feel about the Northwestern football team’s attempt to unionize, Jeff Mathews and Taylor Engstrom provided their perspectives as student athletes. It was especially interesting to hear college athletes from Cornell talk about the labor movement from Cornell because players are not allowed to receive athletic scholarships in the Ivy League. Both Mathews, who recently signed with the Atlanta Falcons, and Engstrom, held similar views about college football players trying to unionize.

Both were intrigued by the movement and believed that medical cost coverage for injuries is a benefit that the NCAA should provide for student athletes. However, both student athletes stated that they did not want to be compensated for their play because they think that this would diminish the enjoyment of college football and the relationship between students and the university that they cherish. Matthews and Engstrom both emphasized that they feel lucky to attend such a prominent university as Cornell, and that they play on the football team and devote more hours than expected because they enjoy playing football.

This event was an interesting way to see how a topic from the sports world could be such a major factor in a discussion of the labor movement. It was intriguing to hear the perspectives of two of Cornell’s most prominent football players who both agreed that they would never want to be compensated for their college play, although they do not receive athletic scholarships in the Ivy League. Their views are similar to those of Kain Colter and his teammates, who are pursuing employee status primarily to secure medical cost coverage. There is a long way to go before a final resolution of the matter, and it will be fascinating to see how this case impacts the future of the NCAA.

This post was written by Taylor Kosakoff, Director of Career Services for the Cornell Sports Business Society.